RE: [xacml] Proposed semantics for operations involving INDETERMI NATE

Title: RE: [xacml] Proposed semantics for operations involving INDETERMINATE

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Engovatov 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 3:05 
  PM
To: 'bill parducci'; xacml
Subject: RE: [xacml] 
  Proposed semantics for operations involving INDETERMINATE

  
I suggest the following evaluation strategy. 

  
1) The is no distinctions made for different functions - order 
  of evaluation is determined by the implementation. 

  

[Daniel 
  Engovatov]  I guess I need to add: "..according to this particular 
  function internal logic".  It may/or may not compute everything, and 
  determine the order, but any attribute EXPLICITLY written into the 
  condition, should be computable - or result in an overall ERROR..  
  Ordered-OR is still in..