← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
[xacml] XACML August 29, 2002 Minutes
Title: XACML Conference Call Minutes
XACML Conference Call
Date: Thursday, August 29, 2002
Time: 10:00 AM EDT
Tel: 512-225-3050 Access Code: 65998
Summary
Reviewed action items and all requested items were complete. Made
progress on the XACML primer by setting a date to put together an outline of
topics and asked for committee input. Discussed the issues
list for technical changes. See voting section for results. Also, there
will be no subcommittee meeting on Monday because of the holiday. Scheduling
was also discussed and the 9/1 approval date of spec has been moved back to
either 9/12 or 10/1 depending on how fast we can make progress on issues around
function specifications.
Action Items
[All] Propose
posting proposed solutions to list and table until next TC call. (Ongoing)
[Tim] incorporate SAML split (delete) and editorial changes into a
version 17 of the spec by Tuesday 8/27 (Partially complete)
[TC] Vote on new wording of charter proposed by Hal
[Michiharu] convert XSLT to minimal for used for conformance cases
(Lower Priority - by 9/5)
[Hal/Konstantin] XACML outline of contents to be proposed by
9/5
[Polar, Anne, others] Post use cases for arguments regarding issue
0007, Make request context Resource Attribute (and Subject) minoccurs=1
[Anne (RFC and X.500) and Michiharu (XPath)]
post pointers to function specifications of these to the list based off
0.8 document posted by Polar on 8/27
[Anne,
mid-Sept 2002] Get comments to Tim on profile for using LDAP to store
policies.
[Anne,
mid-Sept 2002] Update XML Digital Signature profile.
[Anne,
mid-Sept 2002] Send proposal for SAML changes based on our Context to XACML
TC list. After TC review and
modification, we will send it on to SAML.
Deadline for this is SAML's deadline for
finalizing their list for 2.0.
[Tim] Separate SAML document to be created in Sept (Lower Priority)
[Hal/Konstantin] XACML primer needs to be completed in Sept
(Lower Priority)
Votes
Voted to accept minutes of 8/22 meeting
The following issues were voted on and approved:
0002. [Anne] Add mandatory
action-id attribute
0003. [Anne] Add optional
action-namespace attribute
0004. [Anne] Add optional action:implied-action identifier
0005. [Anne] Change
<Result> ResourceURI xml attribute to ResourceId
0006. [Anne] Add
missing-attribute identifier for StatusCode
0010. [Anne] allow more than
two arguments to "add"
0011. [Carlisle] state *Match is matched against AttributeValue
0012. [Carlisle] <AttributeSelector>
in <SubjectMatch> should be [optional]
The following issues were voted on and NOT approved:
0009. [Daniel] Function
naming convention
Proposed Agenda:
10:00-10:05
Roll Call and Agenda Review
10:05-10:10
Vote to accept minutes of August 22 concall
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200208/msg00120.html
10:10-10:15
Review of Action Items (see 8/22 minutes)
10:15 - 10:55 Discussion of v0.16 technical change requests (all)
10:55 - 11:00
Discussion of schedule for Committee Spec (Carlisle)
Roll Call
Ken Yagen, Crosslogix
Hal Lockhart, Entegrity
Carlisle Adams,
Entrust
Konstantin Beznosov,
Hitachi
Michiharu Kudoh, IBM
Steve Andersen, OpenNetwork
Simon Godik, Overxeer
Bill Parducci, Overxeer
Polar Humenn, Self
Anne Anderson, Sun Microsystems
Gerald Brose, Xtradyne
Prospective Members
Piras Vilandai Thiyatarajan, Sun Microsystems
Raw Minutes (taken by Ken Yagen)
Piras Vilandai
Thiyatarajan asked to become a prospective voting
member
Vote to accept minutes of 8/22 call
Michiharu to
provide XPATH usage examples by end of day Friday 8/23
Complete
Propose
posting proposed solutions to list and table until next TC call.
Ongoing
[Anne,
mid-Sept 2002] Get comments to Tim on profile for using LDAP to store
policies.
[Anne,
mid-Sept 2002] Update XML Digital Signature profile.
[Anne,
mid-Sept 2002] Send proposal for SAML changes based on our Context to
XACML TC list. After TC review and
modification, we will send it on to SAML.
Deadline for this is SAML's deadline for
finalizing their list for 2.0.
Tim will incorporate SAML split (delete) and editorial changes into
a version 17 of the spec by Tuesday 8/27
Completed most of editorial
changes and split. Updated 16e published
Anne
volunteers to pull out outstanding change requests from current mailing
list
Complete
Hal to propose new wording of the last paragraph of charter before
next Thursday.
Complete
Michiharu to convert XSLT to minimal for used for conformance cases
(Lower Priority)
Set date of next Thursday
9/5
Separate SAML document to be created (Lower Priority)
Assigned to Tim, but no date
set
XACML primer needs to be completed in Sept (Lower Priority)
Hal
and Konstantin.
What might it contain? Introduction and explanation of
architecture with use of XML. Motivation for the
feature - the intent. Useful to put together an
outline of topics or abstract. Hal suggested exchanging list of topics
before next meeting. Send any thoughts on topics for primer to Hal and
Konstantin. Looking to end of Sept for first draft but will discuss outline and
contents in next week or two.
Discussion of technical changes (10:18)
From Anne's email:
Initial set of Change Requests from 8/22/02. See email for rationale
0002. [Anne] Add mandatory action-id
attribute
Hal - believe this was voted on
previously
Anne - Defined a namespace for actions.
Need an attribute for action name since everything is now attribute.
Vote to approve passed
0003. [Anne] Add optional
action-namespace attribute
Vote to approve passed
0004. [Anne] Add optional action:implied-action identifier
Where resource name implies
the action. Would
be value of action id attribute
Vote to approve passed
0005. [Anne] Change <Result> ResourceURI xml attribute to ResourceId
XML attribute in results called ResourceURI and in request called ResourceId
so change both to ResourceID
Vote to approve passed
0006. [Anne] Add missing-attribute
identifier for StatusCode
Optional for PDP. Is already included in latest draft
Vote to approve passed
0007. [Anne] Make request context
Resource Attribute minoccurs=1
Have to have at least ResourceId
Is request does not specify ResourceId as attribute is it a valid request? It would be
an invalid request by text interpretation of schema.
Does it apply to every element? Does not
apply to subject and action? Maybe that should be minoccurs=1
as well. Every request must identify the resource it is trying to gain access
to. What if resource is account but don't know which account it is? Must
write policy without subject id if cannot count on it being in every PDP. What
if based on attribute of subject (I am a member of manager group)? Can't write
portable policy if don't know what subject information will be supplied.
Maybe ResourceId doesn't have to be there but
there has to be some attribute of resource? If you mandate there will be a SubjectId and ResourceId, can
write a portable policy that guarantees that information will be there. If will mandate something about resource, then you must specify
identifiable attribute of subject. By definition, access request must
say what want to access but not anything else such as subject information. What
if request access to all classified documents? Then PEP is going to be
evaluating a policy.
Anne - propose postpone issue and
people make a case on mailing list with use cases for either minoccurs=0 or 1 and Subject or Resource. Also, should
every request come with ResourceId?
Postponed, no vote
0008. [Anne] list mandatory vs.
non-mandatory functions
Oversight in the spec. Names are not correct.
Were going to go for type and action function. Where
do you specify them and their calculations.
Postponed, no vote
0009. [Daniel] Function naming
convention
Daniel proposed underscore, text currently
uses hyphen. Michiharu suggested hyphens are supported in XPath.
Java/C++ do not support hyphens. Motion
to continue to use dashes. When underscores displayed underlined, like
in hyperlink, cannot distinguish from space.
Vote not to approve and remain with hyphens
0010. [Anne] allow more than two
arguments to "add"
Already changed in function
document. All
other functions remain with two.
Vote to approve passed
0011. [Carlisle] state *Match is matched against AttributeValue
Spell out semantics to clarify
Vote to approve passed
0012. [Carlisle] <AttributeSelector>
in <SubjectMatch> should be [optional]
Listed as required
Vote to approve passed
0013. [Carlisle] <SubjectMatch> in
<SubjectAttributeDesignatorWhere> min/max
element has minOccurs=0.
Now allow both, but previously not.
No vote taken
Nominal voting planned for 9/5 TC Call. Some
members will be at another committee meeting and still issues to resolve on
functions. Still some consistency issues as well (Polar). Should we set 9/12 as
a goal to approve the spec?
At JC committee, Karl Best will propose in
mid September Oasis board meeting to change rules. Submissions can be any
month, not quarterly and approval period will be 2 months. If approved, then we
may be able to submit in October or November if ready.
Anne suggests beginning of October as more
realistic. There are unresolved issues about function semantics and finding
specifications for functions or defining them ourselves. (string,
date, uri equals, string match, rfc822name match,
string >=, etc)
Anne (RFC and X.500) and Michiharu (XPath) will post pointers to some of these to the list.
0.8 Document posted to list on 8/27
(Functions/Semantics) has [Needs Specification] specified where needed. Review
that and add pointers.
Monday is a holiday. No subcommittee call
will be held.
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →