← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
[xacml] extending xacml semantics
MHonArc v2.5.2 --> xacml message [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home] Subject: [xacml] extending xacml semantics From: Simon Godik <> To: Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 23:33:29 -0700 Currently there is no semantics associated with the 'subject' and 'resource' definition in the 'target' of a rule. The only thing we do is match attribute designator with attribute value. Although there was a decision made not to have such semantics, I find it limiting. I propose to allow new elements in the rule target that convey semantics of an attribute. It is accomplished by wrapping subject-match with <subject-class> element, like this: <rule> <target> <subjects> <subject> <subject-class class-id="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:subject:class:group"> <-- this line is new <subject-match match-id="function:string-equal"> <subject-attribute-designator attribute-id="security-role" category="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:subject:access-subject"/> <attribute-value>admin</attribute-value> </subject-match> </subject-class> </subject> </subjects> .... etc ... </target> </rule> This syntax allows us to reason about a subject of a rule. (Same applies to resource). It states not only how to match subject attribute, but also what this attribute is, namely a group. I hope this proposal did not come too late, but if it did, we can consider it for xacml 1.x Simon Follow-Ups: Re: [xacml] extending xacml semantics From: Polar Humenn <> [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home] Powered by eList eXpress LLC
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread