MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
xacml message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml] Summary of Discussion about Submitting XACML (and SAML) to the ITU
From: Anne Anderson <>
To: "Hal Lockhart" <>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:42:39 -0400
On 5 September, Hal Lockhart writes: [xacml] Summary of Discussion about Submitting XACML (and SAML) to the ITU
> 1. Does anyone in the TC have any objections to OASIS doing this? Short of
> objections are there any questions or concerns that should be raised? If no
> one has any problem with this, I propose we pass a resolution to that effect
> at our next regular meeting on September 18th.
No objections or concerns.
> 2. The second question is more vexed. What version of XACML should be
> submitted? OASIS will most likely do whatever the TC recommends here. As I
> see it we have three choices.
>
> a) Submit 1.0. It is complete and approved. Presumably the ITU can fold in
> the errata in some way. This would make the approval of 2.0 a done deal. On
> the other hand, 1.0 is already obsoleted by 1.1.
2nd choice.
> b) Take another look at submitting 1.1 as a OASIS standard. Part of the
> reason for not submitting 1.1 was that there was no strong reason do do so.
> Perhaps this is the reason. I am pretty sure with a little effort we could
> come up with the necessary attestations, assuming the same criteria as for
> 1.0. We could do the public review and submission in parallel with the 2.0
> work. I don't expect a lot of comments. The new 20% rule is an issue, but
> Karl says this is likely to be reversed soon and in any event we will have
> to face it for 2.0.
1st choice. Perhaps ITU would be willing to consider 1.1 as
"errata fixes" for 1.0, since we did no schema changes.
> c) Wait until we finish 2.0. The pros and cons of this are fairly obvious.
3rd choice (way down)
--
Anne H. Anderson Email:
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
