Re: [xacml] Item 60 (Define standard "purpose" attributes)

Daniel Engovatov wrote:
> I do not argue that we should not try to define certain attributes
> within the standard at all.   It just seems that we should do it in a
> more coherent fashion, then one-by-one by exception.

to that end, i [re]suggest that anyone interested post those attributes they 
think may apply so that we can begin formulating a solution. besides 'direction' 
what is in your boat[load]?

b