RE: [xacml] Obligations in Rules roundup

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [xacml] Obligations in Rules roundup




From: "Daniel Engovatov" <>
To: "Polar Humenn" <>, "Seth Proctor" <>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:08:36 -0700






>Would you sell a product that had that "feature", of "Well, I don't
know,
>run it a few times, see what you get".

No, but that does not imply that we need to force one particular way of
avoiding that.  

There are MANY areas where different XACML providers may be not
interoperable.  This is one example.   That does not mean that we need
to mandate some particular narrow solution that one of us happened to
like.

Daniel;