RE: [xacml] XACML Core Spec

From
Polar Humenn <>
Date
2004-04-07T18:12:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [xacml] XACML Core Spec
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

xacml message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [xacml] XACML Core Spec

From: Polar Humenn <>

To: Tim Moses <>

Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:24:43 -0400 (EDT)

On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Tim Moses wrote:

> Polar - In Section 7.9 (Condition evaluation) you have the text ...
>
> 1. "The condition value SHALL be "True" if the <Condition> element is
> absent, or if it evaluates to "True.  Its value is "False" if the
> <Condition> element evaluates to "False"."
>
> In Table 1, (Rule truth table), we list a value for Condition of
> "Indeterminate".
>
> Why doesn't your text explain how a Condition value of "Indeterminate" might
> arise?

Good point. We should probably say something about that.

 The condition value SHALL be "Indeterminate", if the expression contained
 in the <Condtion> element evaluates to "Indeterminate."

Is that good enough?

> 2. The plan is to substitute a proper schema location reference once the
> final v2.0 schema has a permanent location on the OASIS site.
>
> 3. Excluding the <xs:string> tags around the <AttributeValue> contents is
> invalid.  I'm not sure why.  Seth is looking into it.

Really? That seems odd. I haven't run into that problem. (I think).

Cheers,
-Polar

> All the best.  Tim.
>
>