Re: [Fwd: Re: [xacml] url/uri-string-concatenate]

On Jun 17, 2006, at 1:45 AM, Daniel Engovatov wrote:
> Should we say that it may/should be implementation defined?  (I  
> doubt it
> would make sense to have it set per policy - but some folk love  
> relative
> uri..) - on the other hand it would be utterly useless for
> interoperability, so I guess we should live it as is..

It's your last point here that makes me think we should indeed leave  
it as-is. I don't think it makes sense to have this function defined  
in the standard if its behavior is not in fact standard.


seth