Bill Parducci wrote:
> Minutes of XACML TC Meeting 17 January 2008
>
>
> #87 Xpath-expression
> The use of Xpointer in the v2 specification is ambiguously applied
> to the v2 spec. Xpointer is used in the v2 specification non-normative
> examples, but it it not mentioned anywhere in the normative text. Eric
> thinks it was believed to be an error, and that Xpointer has never
> officially been part of XACML. Therefore, Rich and Erik suggest that
> the Xpointer reference should be removed in v3. There was general
> consensus that the Xpointer references be dropped.
I just re-read these minutes and I noticed that it says that "the
Xpointer reference should be removed in v3". I also removed it from the
2.0 errata which I posted yesterday since the consensus was that
xpointer is not part of 2.0. Let me know if this is not what the TC
intended.
Regards,
Erik
