← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

a first proposal to address issue number 19.

From
"Kan Ierrmann"
Date
2009-11-18T20:06:58+00:00
ID
FFADC149AE8847AFB1CFD899A9BB362A@lapschlichter55
Thread
a first proposal to address issue number 19.
Hi all,

 

Below a first proposal to address issue number 19.

 

Proposal:

In the xml use case only, a multiple resource decision
request will have next to the scope attribute an additional attribute called “

urn….:node-type” 

with values like {element-node, attribute-node, text-node
and maybe for completeness reasons ?comment-node, ? processing-instruction-node?}.

 

Further (not directly related) comment:

In an earlier mail somebody mentioned that it might
make sense to put the derived individual resource-id values in a separate attribute
(e.g. derived-resource-id) and not overriding the original resource-id value. I
am not sure whether this is a good|bad idea but we should kept it in mind and
maybe look for pros and cons of doing this.

Best regards

jan 

________________________________________

Jan Herrmann

Dipl.-Inform., Dipl.-Geogr. 

wissenschaftlicher
Mitarbeiter

Technische
Universität München

Institut für Informatik 

Lehrstuhl für
Angewandte Informatik / Kooperative Systeme

Boltzmannstr. 3

85748 Garching

Tel:     
+49 (0)89 289-18692

Fax:     +49 (0)89 289-18657

Raum:

www11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

________________________________________
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →