Hal,
I don't think we can change the content of the spec without reissuing a
new working draft and redoing all the votes. To what level are we
supposed to go next? How many steps is that to redo? And how quickly
can we do the votes?
The problem is that I think in many cases we cannot vote forward
without having the intermediate docs actually present, which means that
there is a two week cycle between each vote.
Best regards,
Erik
On 06/16/2010 09:33 PM, Harold Lockhart wrote:
Erik,
Can we fix this easily? As far I can see there were no
other comments during th epublic review.
Hal
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Herrmann [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 5:48 AM
To: XACML TC
Subject: [xacml] minor bug in the XACML 3.0 core spec
Dear all,
while using
the XACML 3.0 docs, I noticed that in some examples the old
RequestContextPath XML Attribute of the <AttributeSelector> is
used.
In order to
be consistent with the AttributeSelector definition under section 5.30,
we should change this and replace RequestContextPath by Path in the
examples in section 2.
Best regards
jan
