Re: [xacml] Have the basic semantics of Target changed in XACML 3.0?- Is this an issue that needs addressing?
xacml · June 2010 · 2 messages · back to month
| # | Subject | From | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00007 | Re: [xacml] Have the basic semantics of Target changed in XACML 3.0?- Is this an issue that needs addressing? | Erik Rissanen | 2010-06-14 07:21 |
| 00008 | Re: [xacml] Have the basic semantics of Target changed in XACML 3.0?- Is this an issue that needs addressing? | Rich.Levinson | 2010-06-14 15:43 |