Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xacml] another wd-20 minor "issue"

From
Erik Rissanen <>
Date
2011-06-09T17:55:01+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [xacml] another wd-20 minor "issue"
Rich, All,

    

    I propose the following instead:

    

    

    
      
This identifier indicates a system entity
        through which the access
        request was passed.

      
urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:subject-category:intermediary-subject

      
This identifier indicates a system entity
        associated with a local or remote codebase that generated the
        request.  Corresponding subject attributes might include the URL
        from which it was loaded and/or the identity of the code-signer.

      
urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:subject-category:codebase

    
    Best regards,

    Erik

    

    On 06/09/2011 03:05 PM, rich levinson wrote:
    
      
      We probably should mention the Multi-Decision profile in the
      context of the following two

      subject attributes:

      
  X-NONE
  X-NONE
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
  MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  

        
This identifier indicates a system entity
          through which the access
          request was passed.  There may be more
          than one.  No means is provided to
          specify the order in which they passed the message.

        
urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:subject-category:intermediary-subject

        
This identifier indicates a system entity
          associated with a local or remote codebase that generated the
          request.  Corresponding subject attributes might include the URL
          from which it was loaded and/or the identity of the
          code-signer.  There may be more than
          one.  No means is provided to specify
          the order in which they processed the request.

        
urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:subject-category:codebase

      
      Both of these say "There may be more than one.". However, that
      would only be true if

      mulitple-decision capabilities exist, I believe. That may not have
      been what was originally

      intended, but I expect that is probably necessary for consistency.

      

          Rich
Next in thread → Next in month →