RE: [xacml] Generalizing on-permit-apply-second

Hi Steven,


> -----Original Message-----
> From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Steven Legg
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 9:11 AM
> To: Erik Rissanen
> Cc: Bill Parducci; 
> Subject: Re: [xacml] Generalizing on-permit-apply-second
>
> It means a bit more policy set wrapping, but is more robust and easier to follow.

I don't agree with that statement. There is a reason most programming languages have a "switch" or "case" construct in addition to "if".


Thanks,
Ray