Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: [xdi] new XDI operation $set ?
Title: RE: [xdi] new XDI operation $set ? Understood, Bill: jobs come first ;-) From: Barnhill, William [USA] [mailto:] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 12:33 PM To: Drummond Reed; OASIS - XDI TC Subject: RE: [xdi] new XDI operation $set ? Not going to be able to leave in time to make call, so won't be able to join. -----Original Message----- From: Drummond Reed [mailto:] Sent: Thu 2/19/2009 3:24 PM To: 'OASIS - XDI TC' Subject: RE: [xdi] new XDI operation $set ? Markus, yes, this all makes sense to me, and it seems like a sensible optimization. Let's discuss on today's call. =Drummond _____ From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Markus Sabadello Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 11:19 PM To: OASIS - XDI TC Subject: [xdi] new XDI operation $set ? Hi, Sometimes I find myself in situations in which I want to either add or update a statement in an XDI graph. E.g. I want to put the following statement into a graph =markus +name "Markus Sabadello" Today $add and $mod behave like this: If I use $add, and the statement exists already in the graph, I get an error. If I use $mod, and the statement doesn't exist in the graph, I get an error. Right? I'd like to have an operation ($set) that always works, i.e. that behaves like $add if the statement doesn't exists, and like $mod if the statement exists. So I could just do =markus $set / =markus +name "Markus Sabadello" And I wouldn't have to worry if it exists already or not. Does that make sense? Markus
Next in thread →
Next in month →