Re: [xdi] XDI Specs

+1 to Bill and Markus' points: keep specs small and modular.

Mike, this doesn't mean that there is not a set of specs that has highest priority - the specs page communicates that. If you think priority should be changed, that's a great agenda item for next week's call.

=Drummond 

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Barnhill, William [USA] <> wrote:

My two cents: Keep the core as small as possible, and ship it as fast as we can now, then get feedback and use that feedback to shape our work on the supplementary specs while at
 the same time iterating on on the micro-kernel core.

Kind regards,

 

Bill Barnhill

Booz Allen Hamilton - Belcamp,MD

1-757-355-0922 | 


 

From:  [] on behalf of Markus Sabadello []

Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:58 PM

To: Michael Schwartz

Cc: OASIS - XDI TC

Subject: Re: [xdi] XDI Specs

Couldn't you also just use XDI as a local datastore, without exposing it an endpoint?

In this case you only need the graph model, but no link contracts or discovery..

I think we had the discussion a few times before if we want a few larger specs, or smaller modular ones..

Markus

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Michael Schwartz 
<> wrote:

I was just looking at:

 http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xdi/XdiOneSpecs

Current Core specs are:

 Graph Model

 Serialization

 Messaging

 Dictionary

I think Link Contracts, Discovery, and Queries need to be in the Core spec.

- Mike

---------------------------------------------------

Michael Schwartz

Gluu

Founder / CEO



+1 646-810-8761

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, e-mail: 


For additional commands, e-mail: