Hi Arle,
> English: This is some bold text
> Japanese: これは、いくつかのです
The Japanese example, I think, falls into this requirement #9: It changes the type of code, but we still need to make the correspondence between the source and the target.
> Also, how would we handle a case where one set of tags
> in one language could correspond to two (or more) in
> another? (For example, a syntactic unit is bolded in English,
> but it corresponds to two syntactic units that are
> separated in a target language and that both should
> appear as bold with Roman text between them?
That case of split translation with extra codes points to the use case of adding inline codes, for which I don't think we have a requirement yet.
So I would propose a new #10 with something like:
[
Must be able to represent inline codes added to the segment
Sometimes the translation of a formatted text requires the translation to split the source into several parts in different places in the segments and the original codes need to be replicated.
