Type of inline codes - ballot

Hi Bryan,

> I wanted very much to attend this meeting 
> ... But an unexpected work emergency kept me 
> otherwise occupied (sounds strange that one 
> could have a Web CMS emergency...
> ...
> Though the attendees spoke in favor of b) - I 
> just wanted to add that there was also a strong
> argument made against b) in the email thread
> (and in the interest of full disclosure, I 
> am included in that camp). See
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-inline/201112/msg00008.html
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-inline/201112/msg00004.html
>  So I am grateful that the action is to have a ballot. 

Since I didn't took the time to do it during the meeting:

I move to have the following ballot:

----------

How should inline codes should be represented. Essentially this is to decide if span-like code can be represented with span-like element in XLIFF 2.0. In addition this also decides if sc/ec should be a special case of ph.

a) ph for placeholder codes (e.g <br>)
pc for well-formed span-like codes (e.g <b>...<.b>)
sc/ec for span-like codes that are not well-formed.

b) no pc: all span-like codes (well-formed and not well-formed) are represented with sc/ec

c) sc/ec are represented as special cases of ph, well-formed span-like codes are represented with pc

d) everything is represented with ph

----------

Can someone second?

The ballot will be open until Jan-9th, the day before our next meeting, so people have plenty of time.
We have 7 voting members based on the attendance. Because there are 4 choices, we could have no decision. In that case will do a run-off.

Cheers,
-yves