Hi all,
I like this solution a lot. Appeals to the programmer in me. The pedantic smither-of-words in me wonders if that's the best name for the attribute. A better suggestion does not come immediately to mind, but transformed yes/no seems like it could be confused with other functions in the roundtrip phase.
Probably just me.
- Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Yves Savourel
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 8:29 AM
To:
Subject: RE: [xliff-inline] Splitting non-clonable codes
Hi Bryan, all,
> ... I've been thinking about the quandary expressed by Fredrik
> regarding the difficulty in knowing how to preserve the original span
> elements upon the conversion back to original format in cases where a
> split occurred.
Actually we discussed this. One idea that Fredrik suggested would be an optional transformed='yes|no' 'yes' meaning the current notation was modified, 'no' meaning the current notation is the original.
Cheers,
-yves
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:
