Re: [xliff-omos] Feedback on JLIFF examples: aesthetics

Yes, subunit should become subunits
Otherwise it's confusing.

From the OM point of view each subunit can only hold one source and target.. I fiegured that it's array thing, still it should be renamed to plural..

As the JSON specific terminology starts shaping up, we should start working on the mapping table, whet things are in OM, XLIFF, and JLIFF..

Cheers

dF

Dr. David Filip
===========

OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair

OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer

Spokes Research Fellow

ADAPT Centre

KDEG, Trinity College Dublin

Mobile: +420-777-218-122

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Phil Ritchie <> wrote:

+1

 

 

Phil Ritchie

Chief Technology Officer | Vistatec

Vistatec House, 700 South Circular Road,
Kilmainham, Dublin 8, Ireland.

Tel: +353 1 416 8000 | Direct: +353 1 416 8024

Email: 

www.vistatec.com | ISO 9001 | ISO 13485 | EN 15038

Think Global

From: Robert van Engelen [mailto:]

Sent: 01 March 2017 02:08

To: Chase Tingley <>

Cc: Phil Ritchie <>; 

Subject: Re: [xliff-omos] Feedback on JLIFF examples: aesthetics

 

 

For consistency it would be an improvement to add “groups”, “units”, and “subunits” in addition to “group”, “unit”, and “subunit”. Same as “notes” and “note”, which are already part of the schema.

 

 

  Dr. Robert van Engelen, CEO/CTO Genivia Inc.

  voice: (850) 270 6179 ext 104

  fax: (850) 270 6179

  mobile: (850) 264 2676

  

 

On Feb 28, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Chase Tingley <> wrote:

 

I think this is fine, since what these names refer to is not the object themselves, but the array of the object.  XLIFF has no corresponding concept -- <unit> really is a "unit", whereas the corresponding data structure in JLIFF is an anonymous
 object inside an array.   So calling that array "units" makes sense.

 

Robert, what do you think?

 

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Phil Ritchie <> wrote:

 

All

 

In familiarizing myself with the examples by writing prototype implementations I would find it more natural if the serialization reads
 like the objects and properties of my model. Would we not name “unit” and “subunit” as plural as they potentially store multiple sub-objects?

 

Phil

 

Phil Ritchie

Chief Technology Officer

 | 

Vistatec

Vistatec House, 700 South Circular Road,

Kilmainham, Dublin 8, Ireland.

Tel: 

+353 1 416 8000

 | 

Direct: 

+353 1 416 8024

Email: 



www.vistatec.com

 | 

ISO 9001

 | 

ISO 13485

 | 

EN 15038

Think Global