← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

(no subject)

From
David Filip
Date
2012-02-07T18:43:00+00:00
ID
Thread
—
Hi Yves,  when I was referring to the overload of <group> in 1.2 spec  I had this attribute in mind
http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/v1.2/os/xliff-core.html#merged-trans
This is also what IN! are using for merging <trans-unit>s if segmentation does not fit.
So if one of the uses of group is for merging trans-units, they cannot be blamed IMHO if they choose to use it with this semantics only. Group is an optional element that is potentially recursive but no guidance and/or processing requirements are given in the 1.2 spec, so they should be fine I guess in using it for just merging management..
Rgds  dF
PLEASE NOTE MY NEW MOBILE CONTACT!
David Filip, Ph.D.

=====================

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158  mailto: 
Please use    for LRC business
www.davidf.org ,  http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidfatdavidf
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread