RE: [xliff-schemas] Minutes...

Hi 
Enda,

 

I 
share your interpretation of the minutes from the last TC (ie. 'the 
main

TC 
should decide'). The ambiguity from my point of view is the 
phrase

'case 
by case basis'. My understanding was that our subcommittee

should 
send out a document that contains all of the 
enumeration-type

attribute values, and that the main TC should decide 
for every attribute,

whose 
list of values currently consists of 'recommendations' should 
be

 

a) 
closed

b) a 
mixture of 'legal/recommanded' values and user-defined 
values

c) 
completely user-defined

 

Best, 
Christian

-----Original Message-----
From: Enda McDonnell 
[mailto:]
Sent: Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2002 
19:51
To: ''
Subject: 
[xliff-schemas] Minutes...

Hi 
guys,

Minutes attached.  I will send these minutes as-is 
to the main group.

Bye 
the way, on re-reading the minutes from the last TC meeting, the following is 
how the issue of suggesting lists to the main group was minuted on the 19th 
Feb.  It is ambiguous, and I wasn't there to recall, but I read the 'whole 
group' here as the main TC group, am I wrong?  This is not what we 
decided today.  

"The 
issue of whether recommended lists should be open or close was raised.
It was 
decided this should be decided on a case by case basis by the whole
group. 
Eric will provide a list of these for discussion."

Regards,

Enda