[xliff] More Notes from Today's meeting

More Notes from Today's meeting. These are very broad

Peter.

We propose that we will be able to use XLIFF as a secondary namespace on an
XML document. As Gerard's proposal. There was a lot of enthusiasm for this
idea.

Formal Extensibility
1 Namespaces
1.1 Agreement this is a good thing
1.2 How
1.2.1 Namespaces within XLIFF document
	Public
	Private
1.2.2 Entension registry
	Extension point
	E.g. Someone sees cType XLIFF as not sufficient and put in cType
Novell
1.2.3 <xliff xmlns:ctype Novell="htttp://blahh">
2 Meeting agreed
2.1 Extend attribute values
2.2 Extend attribute
2.3 Extend elements with structure
2.4 Will revise current lists values and attributes
2.5 Spec to define which attributes are extensible
2.6 Define conformance issues in spec (business rule)
3 ISO 12620
4 Formal guidelines on extending XLIFF
5 Open Lists
5.1 Close some lists
5.2 Extend via private namespaces
5.3 All lists will not be closed
5.4 It is better to have a formal way of extension as it provides a method
for validation
5.5 Xliffdatatypes might be a namespace where the lists are externalised
6 Prop/ Context group
6.1 No structure data
6.2 Note defined
7 Eric's Proposal



Peter Reynolds, Software Development Manager, Berlitz GlobalNET
3, West Pier Business Campus, Dun Laoghaire, Co. Dublin, Ireland
Tel: +353-1-202-1280
Fax: +353-1- 202-1299
Web Site: http//www.berlitzglobalnet.com
"Don't just translate it, BerlitzIT" http//www.berlitzIT.com