Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xliff] Re: a case for "finished" as a valid value forstate

From
John Reid <>
Date
2003-04-10T22:30:11+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [xliff] Re: a case for "finished" as a valid value forstate
Title: 

Hi Bryan, 

 

Thanks. I agree that it is hair-splitting. I also like your definitions of 
the terms. I want 'final' to indicate definitive and unalterable. However, I jus 
remembered that we have the approved attribute in trans-unit and bin-unit that, 
"Indicates whether a translation is final," according to the spec. I'm not 
sure exactly how that affects this discussion but it seems to remove the need 
for 'signed-off'.

 
thanks,

john
Next in thread → Next in month →