Re: [xliff] FW: XLIFF <bin-unit> question

Let's leave the XLIFF spec as it is then,  since we already reference 
the MIME spec already.

I'll put forth the ballot immediately.

Regrards,
Tony


Yves Savourel wrote:

>We would say something like: "The byte order in the block of MIME data follow the rule defined by the MIME specification." But on second thought, maybe we don't need to specify anything: since we refer to MIME's specification already. There is no reasons to make endianess a specific case.
>Either way is fine with me.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:  [mailto:]
>Sent: Wed, May 14, 2003 11:20 AM
>To: Yves Savourel; 
>Subject: Re: RE: [xliff] FW: XLIFF <bin-unit> question
>
>
>Yves and all: 
>
>I assume that a revision to the spec with this note inserted into a revised spec we will not require a review iteration before voting on it.  If anyone disagrees,  please raise a flag.  Otherwise,  as soon as Yves posts the revised spec I'll immediately set up the ballot.
>
>Feel free to object.
>
>Regards,
>Tony
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Tony Jewtushenko					mailto:
Principal Product Manager				direct tel: +353.1.8039080
ST Tools Technology Team
Oracle Corporation, Ireland