RE: [xliff] Groups - Standing XLIFF Teleconference(Bi-Weekly)modified

I suppose we should.

I also suppose we will keep a list of 
changes during the revue period (if any are needed), and integrate them in 
the specifications.

 

  
-----Original 
  Message-----
From: John Reid 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Tue, August 05, 2003 8:28 
  AM
To: 
Subject: RE: [xliff] 
  Groups - Standing XLIFF Teleconference(Bi-Weekly)modified

  
Hi Yves,

  
 

  
Thanks for pointing out the differences. I should have known to look in 
  the changes section. We still point to the 0522 version in the submission 
  document. Should we point at the 0625 version instead?

  
 

  
thanks,

  
john

>>> "Yves Savourel" <> 
  8/5/03 8:01:49 AM >>>
Hi John,

To answer one of your 
  question:

> 4/Standards Review Process - the approvals process and 
  timing.
> At this meeting we will vote on the timing of the submission 
  to
> the OASIS standards review process. Chair proposes that we 
  submit
> the XLIFF 1.1 spec, Schema and Whitepaper for peer 
  review
> starting 11 Aug and ending 24 September 2003. Proposed 
  reviewers
> are: all OASIS TC's, LISA OSCAR, W3C i18n WG, and possibly 
  LRC.
> Coverage rosters for monitoring and responding to comments 
  and
> queries during the review process will be drawn up. If not 
  enough
> coverage is available during August due to holidays, etc, 
  then
> we'll push out the review period start date to early 
  September.
> FYI: document names for specs, schema's etc, are being 
  reviewed
> and modified in accordance with OASIS naming 
  conventions.
>
> </jr>The submission text is good. However, 
  we have a 20030522 and
> a 20030625 cs-core-xliff-1.1 version of the 
  document. What is
> different in the 20030625 version? We point at the 
  20030522 in
> most places but when Latest version: is selected the 
  20030625
> document comes up. This is a bit confusing. Can we clean this 
  up?
> I vote to approve once these issues are resolved, if 
  possible.

The latest version of the specification to refere to is 
  ALWAYS:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xliff/documents/xliff-specification.htm 
  
(no date). The ones with date are there for history (same mechanism as 
  for
W3C specifications). Obviously in same case you may want to refer to 
  a
specific version.

The change versions are also normaly indicated 
  in the "Changes Since
Previous Version" appendix. In this case the change 
  between 20030522 and
20030625 is a correction in the XSD file (we had a 
  duplicated entries
"pageheader" for the datatype values, it needed to be 
  one "pageheader" and
one "pagefooter"). Since the attributes values are 
  also listed in the
specification (automatically generated from the XSD 
  file), it had to be
updated too.

Good luck at your dentist (I went 
  through that yesterday :)

Kenavo,
-yves

You may leave 
  a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/members/leave_workgroup.php