<attachment provided> RE: revised XLIFF 1.2 Draft

-----Original Message-----

From: Tony Jewtushenko
[mailto:] 

Sent: 17 October 2005 19:46

To: ''

Subject: revised XLIFF 1.2 Draft

 

I’ve attached the
revised XLIFF 1.2 spec fixing the problems reported by Bryan and others.

 

I’ve also fixed a
typo reported in a comment email regarding phase-name being optional in the
<phase> element section.

 

We’ll discuss the
spec tomorrow as well as the suggested changes made by Magnus.

 

I also urge those of you
who haven’t yet voted on the PO/POT representation guide spec to do so as
soon as possible.  If you have no opinion on the spec, please vote
“abstain”.  Not submitting a ballot counts towards your voting
member eligibility.  We’ll discuss the result of the ballot at
tomorrow’s teleconference.

 

 

Regards,

Tony

 

 

Tony Jewtushenko

Director- R&D - Product
Innovator Ltd. (Ireland)

P: +353.1.8875183; M:
+353.87.2479057; W: www.productinnovator.com

 

draft-xliff-1.2.zip