RE: [xliff] More XSD & Spec revisions

From
<>
Date
2006-05-12T17:18:17+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [xliff] More XSD & Spec revisions
Title: Message

Hi 
Tony,

 

In 
preparation for Monday's deadline for final revisions, and Tuesday's ballot, 
I'll be happy to run XML diagnostics on the revised XSDs and XLIFF sample 
files.  I know that Doug will do excellent work, but it would probably be a 
good to have a second person do a final QA to ensure XML validity.  If for 
no other reason, it will put a little mileage on the schema and samples before 
the ballot goes out.

 

Doug, 
if you want to take me up on my offer, I'll be available to run tests today and 
Monday.  (this will be a good time for me to fix the strict sample 
"almost everything," where you pointed out that the tool attribute in 
the phase element is deprecated.)

 

Thanks,

 

Bryan

 

  

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Jewtushenko 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, May 
  12, 2006 9:35 AM
To: Schnabel, Bryan S; 
  
Cc: ; 
  
Subject: [xliff] More XSD & Spec 
  revisions

  
 

  
 

  
Asgeir has idendtified a number of other minor problems with the spec 
  & XSD.  I've noted the revisions required below,  but if anyone 
  has any further input please provide it as soon as possible.  I suggest 
  that Doug go ahead and make the necessary changes to the XSD and I'll send a 
  revised spec later today.  We'll need final revisions done by 
  Monday.  

  
 

  
Again thanks for Asgeir for his careful review and identification of the 
  spec and XSD.

  
 

  
Hopefully this represents the last of the spec issues.

  
 

  
Regards,

  
Tony

  
 

  
 

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Asgeir Frimannsson 
  [mailto:] 
Sent: 12 May 2006 01:31
To: Tony 
  Jewtushenko
Subject: More XLIFF spec corrections

  
Hi Tony,

  
Some further minor corrections to the XLIFF spec:

  
2.5.1. Adding Elements:
<xliff> and <seg-source> are 
  listed as extension points - they are not
in the schema
(the listed 
  <xliff> element above also has an incorrect html anchor link)

  
TONY> this needs to be corrected in the spec.  I'm sure we added 
  an extension point at xliff and I'm somewhat certain seg-source should also 
  have one.

  

2.5.2. Adding Attributes:
<xliff> and <seg-source> 
  support non-xliff attributes in the schema,
but are not listed 
  here.
(This probably relates to the issue above - a mixup when updating the 
  spec?)
In addition, <tool> is currently listed, but does not 
  support
non-xliff attributes in the schema.

  
TONY>I'll revise the spec but tool needs to be updated in the 
  schema.

  
2.5.3. Adding Attribute Values
Again, alttranstype and reformat 
  supports user defined values ('x-')
in the schema, but are not listed 
  here.
TONY>I'll revise the spec

  
Element detail for <target>:
Missing description of equiv-trans 
  and equiv-trans is not listed in
optional attributes
TONY>I'll revise 
  the spec

  
Element detail for <group>:
Missing description of merged-trans 
  and merged-trans is not listed in
optional attributes
TONY>I'll 
  revise the spec

  
Element detail for <alt-trans>
No anchor on <seg-source> 
  element in description
TONY>I'll revise the spec

  
cheers,
asgeir