I am glad to finally see these XLIFF Profiles being developed. I think
these Profiles are critical to helping people understand the intent of
XLIFF and how best to use it so that there is some consistency across
products, companies and tools which process XLIFF files.
I recently became an observer of this Technical Committee, so some of my
comments may have already been covered in previous discussions. I work for
IBM in a globalization area, so my comments are not intended to be "IBM's
comments", but only my personal comments.
1. Throughout the document, I would suggest that the terms
"ResourceBundle", "PropertyResourceBundle" and "ListResourceBundle"
should always be written as single words, since these are references to
specific Java classes.
