← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xliff] RE: [xliff-comment] Section 2.5.4 Validating Documentswith Extensions - needs revision

From
Rodolfo M. Raya <>
Date
2006-10-25T17:16:14+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [xliff] RE: [xliff-comment] Section 2.5.4 Validating Documentswith Extensions - needs revision
Having said all that, I just realized a serious drawback to using "strict".
Because XLIFF is used as an interchange format (the 'I' in XLIFF), the file
is processed multiple times by various applications and vendors. Using
"strict" would require ALL the vendors to HAVE ALL the proprietary schemas
used within the XLIFF document. Obviously, this is not practical. So I guess
"strict" is not an option.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →