Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xliff] CS02 Uploaded

From
Mary McRae <>
Date
2007-09-15T00:10:48+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [xliff] CS02 Uploaded
Wow, thanks Rodolfo, I didn't even know that file existed. I can't do that
one myself since it involves a different server, but I'll enter a support
issue for our IT dept to set up the redirect. I couldn't locate the previous
PDF; I'll grab that as well and get it uploaded.

Thanks!

Mary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rodolfo M. Raya [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 7:44 PM
> To: 
> Cc: 
> Subject: Re: [xliff] CS02 Uploaded
> 
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:44:38 -0400
> "Mary McRae" <> wrote:
> 
> 
> >   The latest version of the specification has been uploaded. I had to
> > revise the document as the links as specified on the cover page were
> > incorrect and would have required duplicating the existing documents
> > in the repository. Please let me know if anything isn't working
> > properly.
> >
> 
> Hi Mary,
> 
> Thanks for uploading the files.
> 
> I noticed that you removed the link to the PDF of version CS01. That
> PDF is in Kavi, in the several zip bundles that I prepared before. The
> link was correct, but it expected a file that should have been
> uploaded.
> 
> It is very important that the link to "latest version" published in old
> releases be redirected. This URL:
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xliff/documents/xliff-
> specification.htm
> 
> needs to point to:
> 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/xliff-core.html
> 
> OASIS changed server, breaking permanent links to latest version. Users
> that downloaded XLIFF 1.1 must be redirected to current pages when they
> click on the link to latest version.
> 
> Best regards,
> Rodolfo
> 
> --
> The information in this e-mail is intended strictly for the addressee,
> without prejudices, as a confidential document. Should it reach you,
> not being the addressee, it is not to be made accessible to any other
> unauthorised person or copied, distributed or disclosed to any other
> third party as this would constitute an unlawful act under certain
> circumstances, unless prior approval is given for its transmission. The
> content of this e-mail is solely that of the sender and not necessarily
> that of Heartsome.
Next in thread → Next in month →