Next in thread → Next in month →

Groups - XLIFF Teleconference added

From
<>
Date
2009-08-31T03:25:34+00:00
ID
Thread
Groups - XLIFF Teleconference added
XLIFF Teleconference has been added by Bryan Schnabel*

Date:  Tuesday, 01 September 2009
Time:  11:00am - 12:00pm ET

Event Description:
US: (712) 432-1600
Austria: 0820 4000 1552
Belgium: 070 35 9974
France: 0826 100 256
Germany: 01805 00 76 09 
Ireland: 0818 270 021
Italy: 848 390 156
Netherlands: 0870 001 920
Spain: 902 886025
Switzerland: 0848 560 179
UK: 0844 581 9102 (note: new number)

2/ Enter the Participant Access Code: 737043#

Agenda:
1/ Roll call
 
2/ Approve August 18, 2009 meeting minutes:
   Accept, reject, or amend.
   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200908/msg00005.html

3/ Face to face meeting Munich, November 16, 17
  A. Attendee list
    Yes: Bryan, Magnus, Asgeir and Rodolfo
    No (yes to dial-in): Yves,Tony
  B. Rodolfo will check with JoAnn about meeting facility in Munich
  
4/ XLIFF 1.2 Errata Status
  A. Rodolfo will update the required documents and submit them for approval.
  B. Good news, Schemas, Samples, and Spec are all fixed and ready to be voted on

5/ Review Requirements for inline elements [define, understand, then vote - being mindful of Tony's suggestion of limiting the length of discussion]
(come to consensus on the requirements, then assign owners to propose wording for the spec)    
(http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/OneContentModel/Requirements?action=show&redirect=Requirements)

{here's my *score card*:

1.1. Definitions/Terminology
"This section is under construction. " (additional examples have been added)

 3.1.1. Common representation of 'inline' markup vs 'block-level' markup
   1. [Resolved]
   2. [Resolved]
   3. [Not Resolved]
 3.1.2. Canonical Representation of native content
   [Not Resolved - Christian annotated a distinction:
   "Maybe, we may want to differentiate between two types of canonical representation:"
	1. a semantic/abstract one
	2. an encoded/concrete one]
 3.1.3. Extensibility / Annotations
   ["Christian will modify item 3.1.3 and separate extensibility 
     from annotations. Action item: Christian to extend the text 
     to clarify the scope and meaning of the request.]
 3.1.4. [Resolved] Content Manipulation
 3.1.5. [Not yet addressed] XML Implementation 
 3.1.6. [Not yet addressed] General Scope}

6/ If something is valid XML and not disallowed explicitly by the specification, it means it is allowed?(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200906/msg00008.html) (Question captured from Yves' comment on Rodolfo's XLIFF Checker Tool)

7/  "XLIFF 2.0 will be complete when _______" 
  There are two camps for filling in the blank
 
  A. Set a calendar goal. All items that are complete and approved by the 
     TC make it into XLIFF 2.0 - All others need to wait for the "next train," 
     i.e., XLIFF 2.X or XLIFF 3. Special care needs to be taken to define 
     doneness and ensure no dependency issues between items. 
     And "XLIFF 2.0 is complete on set date of *Month/Day/Year*"
          
         - or - 
 
 B. Define a finite set of XLIFF 2.0 items. Set a cutoff date for adding items. 
    The list of accepted items becomes our requirements document.
    And "XLIFF 2.0 is complete when items 1 through X are finished"
    (some in this camp see our current set of goals, as is, as that 
    finite list)

    i. Yves commented that XLIFF is not a software. And we should be careful with releasing versions that do not have some specific features we know will ultimately end up there. (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/200904/msg00018.html)
 
8/ XLIFF 2.0 
(http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking)

Minutes:


View event details:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xliff/event.php?event_id=25092

PLEASE NOTE:  If the above link does not work for you, your email
application may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able to
copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web
browser.
Next in thread → Next in month →