Next in thread →
Next in month →
RE: XLIFF questionnaire results
Hi Dimitra, This is very informative. Sincere thanks to you and Reinhard for undertaking this task. The results are very interesting. Perhaps I'm slightly a victim of interpreting the results to suit my own biases, but the themes that I noticed to be consistent were: simplify; provide clear compliance specifications; retain the solid core - but jettison some of the complex, tool-specific fluff; and get the word out to tool-makers because more/consistent support is needed. I could almost imagine a subcommittee whose charter is: come up with a specific recommendation to the TC on how to. . . " simplify / provide compliance spec / jettison fluff / inform tool-makers " I look forward to how other interprate these results. Thanks so much for this work, and for sharing, Bryan From: Dimitra.Anastasiou [mailto:] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 2:25 AM To: Subject: [xliff] XLIFF questionnaire results Dear members of the XLIFF TC, I conducted an XLIFF questionnaire and I am attaching both the questionnaire and its results. The file consists of 8 sheets corresponding to the 8 questions of the questionnaire. I am not good at all at presenting statistics, so, any suggestions about how and where this can be used are welcome. There are some good thoughts in sheets 6 and 7. Regards, Dimitra Dimitra Anastasiou, PhD Post-doc Researcher http://www.d-anastasiou.com email: SKYPE: dimitraanas Localisation Research Centre: http://www.localisation.ie Centre for Next Generation Localisation: http://www.cngl.ie/
Next in thread →
Next in month →