Re: [xliff] Where we stand on conformance, and how to best resolve(RE: XLIFF TC Meeting 16 Nov 2010)

My position is
      substantially the same as Rodolfo’s, and I wouldn’t argue it
      either since you are all more invested than I am. (And I should be
      clear that I am not opposed to providing guidance for processing:
      rather I question whether it is an effective way to approach
      conformance verification.)

      

      -Arle

      

      On 11/15/10 15:08 , sic scripsit Rodolfo M. Raya:
      
        
        

          
Hi Bryan,

          
 

          
I already presented my point of
              view regarding the inclusion of processing expectations in
              the conformance clause. I personally believe we should not
              try to comment on application conformance. 

          
 

          
We spent too much time on this
              issue and there is no need to continue with the
              discussion. If the majority wants to include processing
              expectations in the conformance clause, I will not argue.

          
 

          
Regards,

          
Rodolfo

          

            
--

            
Rodolfo M. Raya   <>

            
Maxprograms      http://www.maxprograms.com