Rodolfo and Yves,
Please add me to the *agree* list.
I'm never quite sure how to indicate the next person in agreement after somebody has indicated their agreement with "+1." Should I also say "+1" or do I increment (i.e., +2)?
- Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Yves Savourel [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 6:19 AM
To:
Subject: RE: [xliff] XLIFF 2.0 Core
Hi Rodolfo,
Using a "unit > segment > language" structure looks ok to me. It is one of the two representations I was thinking about.
It does have the advantage to make the segment id un-necessary. Simpler is better.
We may have to think a bit about tools that allow cross-aligned segments, but that can possibly be resolved with an optional id.
The scenario you are describing is a good use case and I agree with the example of process: Segmentation change is one of the modifications the merging tool should be able to handle.
I also concur that clear definitions of the different parts are important.
> The example described above could be improved by adding optional
> elements between segments that would hold stuff we don't want
> translators to see, like the spaces at the start of a sentence
> or perhaps some formatting that applies to the whole sentence.
+1
So, yes Rodolfo, we basically agree.
-ys
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
