> You did not misunderstand what XLIFF core means,
> we agree on that part. The problem is with compliance.
> We can define compliance of XLIFF files regarding
> a schema and a specification document but we
> cannot evaluate the compliance of a tool.
That's right. The TC had that discussion a while back.
And I recall tending to agree with your opinion that it's not really possible to verify how a tool behave, just if the file it produces is conformant.
That's a topic different from the technical details of the core and the modules.
I'll go back to that.
-ys
