Forgot to mention IBM concerns:
- Integration of memory specification
in under XLIFF or separately thru Unicode ULI TC. Unless we can do the
following, We are not entirely convinced TMX should not live on its own:
*
<trans_unit> be limited to one entry per segment and not more
*
restructure the <source> and <target> against the TMX <tuv
xml:lang="xx"> tags. However, I do not see a need of specifying
more than one language pair at a time. That is something never used in
practice in TMX
*
fold the <note> and <prop> tags together
*
TMX needs <note> on <tuv> level because the translator may
have added comments are to why the text was translated this way
From:
Helena S Chapman/San
Jose/IBM@IBMUS
To:
"Lucia.Morado"
<>
Cc:
,
"Yves Savourel" <>
Date:
05/03/2011 12:18 PM
Subject:
RE: [xliff]
ULI
As mentioned, I'd like to call an off-line
meeting. Please write me if you are interested. Agenda:
- I have some idea of the initial focus area: SRX and TMX related. Specifically,
1. TR29 specifying the definition and types
of textual segmentation rules that applies across the entire life cycle
of content, not just during translation phase.
2. SRX being the interchange standards for
#1.
3. CLDR to publish language specific segmentation
behavior. Following the core/module concept, the specialty module would
not be expected to be 100% interoperable. However, core should.
4. Sort out whether there is a need for memory
specific standards outside XLIFF. I have a list of concerns and issues
to share. See below.
- Any of the above does not belong in Unicode? I need your input on what
to stay out of or mind my own business and WHY? What type of interaction
point would be needed between the two?
I plan to call this meeting soon before I kick off the ULI activity on
the Unicode side. Please write me by noon EDT Wed May 4th with a few availability
options and I will send invitation shortly after. I will not be able to
accommodate all the requirements, my apologies in advance.
Best regards,
Helena Shih Chapman
Globalization Technologies and Architecture
+1-720-396-6323 or T/L 938-6323
Waltham, Massachusetts
From: "Lucia.Morado"
<>
To: "Yves
Savourel" <>, <>
Date: 05/03/2011
10:30 AM
Subject: RE:
[xliff] ULI
I see Helena as the current TC officer, she might clarify this in
today's meeting. http://unicode.org/uli/
Lucia
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yves Savourel [mailto:]
> Sent: 03 May 2011 13:01
> To:
> Subject: [xliff] ULI
>
> FYI:
>
> A new TC at the Unicode Consortium
>
http://unicode-inc.blogspot.com/2011/04/unicode-consortium-announces.htm
l
>
> Interesting.
> So, what happens when something published by the ULI TC and something
> published by the XLIFF TC are contradictory?
>
> Cheers,
> -ys
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS
at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
