Hi David, all,
> Only the Owner can suggest reconsideration of an
> item in section 3.
> [Alternative additional conditions for reconsideration
> of items in section 3:]
> EITHER
> 1. Not sooner than 4 months after the item was
> placed in Section 3.
> OR
> 2. Majority of *all* voting members needed (via kavi to
> all eligible, or also possible if the meeting majority is
> at the same time the majority of all current voting members).
> OR
> 3. No additional conditions.
A suggestion: How about no conditions at all? Anyone can suggest reconsideration of an item in section 3 and we do a simple ballot on that. Why putting "artificial limitations" (in my opinion) to do things? The bottom line is that the group always end up deciding anyway.
Just my 2 cents.
-yves
