Hi Frederik,
No problemo - we can extend <x/> in the same way is
<itag>.
Best Regards,
Andrzej Zydroń
CTO
XTM International
Tel: +44 (0) 1753 480 469
Fax: +44 (0) 1753 480 465
Mob: +44 (0) 7966 477 181
email:
www: http://www.xtm-intl.com
Skype: zydron
This message contains confidential information and is
intended only for
the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you may
not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the
sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by
mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
error-free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not
accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of
this
message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification
is required please request a hard-copy version. Unless
explicitly stated
otherwise this message is provided for informational purposes
only and
should not be construed as a solicitation or offer.
On 27/10/2011 09:18, Estreen, Fredrik wrote:
Hi,
I
don’t see how using only <g> and <x/> would be a
step forward for non XML source formats. Unless the
<x> tag is greatly extended with additional attributes
like the <itag> that was proposed for TMX 2.0.
Consider this old style HTML example:
This
<b> is traditional <i>HTML</b> with
overlap</i>.
It
can of course be tagged using <x> tags but we then
lose all information on the pairing of the native codes like
this:
This
<x id=”1” /> is traditional <x id=”2”
/>HTML<x id=”3” /> with overlap<x id=”4” />.
Using
<g> is not possible since the result would not be XML.
Regards,
Fredrik
Estreen
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of Arle Lommel
Sent: den 26 oktober 2011 22:53
To: Andrzej Zydron
Cc:
Subject: Re: [xliff] [xliff-inline] Representing
information for the starting/ending/standalone parts
I wasn't arguing to use <itag>, but
rather to look at it for anything useful that might help.
-Arle
On Oct 26, 2011, at 12:33 , Andrzej
Zydron wrote:
Hi
Arle,
Of Rodolfo's stunning brilliance I have no
doubt, but on reflection my personal choice would not be
to invent yet another element when we already have
<g> and <x/>. Everyone involved with XLIFF
knows what these are and what they mean and they have
the added benefit of being backwards compatible with all
versions of XLIFF and even OpenTag.
Best
Regards,
Andrzej
Zydroń
