RE: [xliff] Plural forms and XLIFF

From
Yves Savourel <>
Date
2012-01-10T17:27:50+00:00
ID
assp.0356a348fe.assp.0356f23110.003101cccfbc$f49af8e0$ddd0eaa0$@com
Thread
RE: [xliff] Plural forms and XLIFF
Hi Rodolfo,

> The example you gave is not good for 
> considering plural forms.

Yes, PO plural forms are different, but ChoiceFormat is about plural forms too (http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/i18n/format/choiceFormat.html).
And, I agree, it is also about sub-flows.

The question the SC has is: How would one represent this and does the inline codes need more than the simple subflows attribute to handle it? (or should one even uses sub-flows in this case? Maybe that makes thing just more complicated than they need to be).

Cheers,
-ys