RE: [xliff] Metadata extensibility ballot

From
Rodolfo M. Raya <>
Date
2012-06-15T14:14:38+00:00
ID
[email protected]
Thread
RE: [xliff] Metadata extensibility ballot
You used <mrk> in your example. That element only goes inside <source> or <target>.

Also, one premise we defined is not to allow extensions for things XLIFF already provides. If XLIFF defines the "translate" attribute, a replacement from ITS should not be allowed. And don't force me to use ITS when a simple attribute like "translate" can be included in XLIFF.

Regards,
Rodolfo
--
Rodolfo M. Raya       
Maxprograms       http://www.maxprograms.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yves Savourel [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 11:11 AM
> To: 'Rodolfo M. Raya'; 
> Subject: RE: [xliff] Metadata extensibility ballot
> 
> Hi Rodolfo,
> 
> > Are you suggesting we allow third party namespaces in <source> and
> > <target> ?
> 
> Nope, never did.
> 
> I think elements of custom namespaces should be allowed only where
> <metaHolder> would be allowed.
> 
> -ys