Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [xliff] Extension points

From
Rodolfo M. Raya <>
Date
2012-07-12T14:16:57+00:00
ID
[email protected]
Thread
RE: [xliff] Extension points
Hi,

I prefer a restricted list of elements accepting custom attributes, like the
one Yves proposed. I would go one step further and not allow custom
attributes in <xliff>

Regards,
Rodolfo
--
Rodolfo M. Raya       
Maxprograms       http://www.maxprograms.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From:  [mailto:] On
Behalf
> Of Schnabel, Bryan S
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:38 AM
> To: Yves Savourel; 
> Subject: RE: [xliff] Extension points
> 
> Very good architecture from my point of view on the elements. My instinct
> on attributes is to be more inclusive. I see extensibility on attributes
to be
> less likely abused (maybe I'm wrong about that), and more likely to be
> useful. Therefore I wonder if it might be better to assume all elements
can
> have extensible attribute *unless* there's a reason to exclude them?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bryan
> ________________________________________
> From:  [] On Behalf Of
> Yves Savourel []
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 11:31 PM
> To: 
> Subject: [xliff] Extension points
> 
> I had an action item to come up with an initial list of extension points.
> 
> Here is an initial proposal:
> 
> 
> --- For elements:
> 
> I propose to allow element extension point at the following locations:
> 
> - In <file> just before the first <unit>.
> - In <unit> just before the element's closing tag.
> - In <segment> just before the element's closing tag.
> - In <ignorable> just before the element's closing tag.
> 
> This happens to match what Rodolfo defined for <metadata> so far. I think
> this make sense, as it's logical to allow both <metadata> and custom
> namespaces at the same locations since both are extension mechanisms.
> 
> - In addition we already have an element extension point in <skeleton>
(and
> no <metadata> there, which also make sense).
> 
> 
> --- For attributes:
> 
> I propose to allow extension points for the following elements:
> 
> In <xliff>, <file>, <unit>, <segment>, <ignorable>, <source> and <target>.
> As well as in <match> in the Matches module.
> 
> 
> I have also an action item to do about the processing expectations,
that'll
> come later.
> 
> Cheers,
> -yves
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
Next in thread → Next in month →