RE: [xliff] XLIFF 2.0 - dF Sanity Check of the spec - question for the editors #002

From
Rodolfo M. Raya <>
Date
2012-10-25T13:20:15+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [xliff] XLIFF 2.0 - dF Sanity Check of the spec - question for the editors #002
Spaces may be meaningless for the target language (Chinese, Thai, etc.) Preserving spaces may not be necessary in all cases.

Regards,

Rodolfo

--
Rodolfo M. Raya 
Maxprograms http://www.maxprograms.com

 

 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [xliff] XLIFF 2.0 - dF Sanity Check of the spec - question for
the editors #002
From: "Dr. David Filip" <>
Date: Thu, October 25, 2012 11:06 am
To: 

Dear Rodolfo, Yves,

In Section 2.1, the second general processing requirement says

When a <target> child is added to a <segment> element, the value of
its xml:space attribute
should be set to preserve if the xml:space attribute of the sibling
<source> element is set to
preserve.

Can we list a single possibly valid reason not to preserve if the
source is set to preserve?
If not, we probably want to say MUST instead of SHOULD.

Thanks for your attention
dF

Dr. David Filip
=======================
LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
mailto: 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
For additional commands, e-mail: