RE: [xliff] Call for dissent csprd01 comments 033, 057, and 061 - Validation Module design changes proposal.

From
Ryan King <>
Date
2013-07-16T17:32:05+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [xliff] Call for dissent csprd01 comments 033, 057, and 061 - Validation Module design changes proposal.
OK, that makes sense. Thanks, Yves for the clarification. Consider that part of the proposal revoked.

 

From: Yves Savourel [mailto:]

Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:06 AM

To: Ryan King; 'Dr. David Filip'

Cc: ; Kevin O'Donnell; Uwe Stahlschmidt; Alan Michael

Subject: RE: [xliff] Call for dissent csprd01 comments 033, 057, and 061 - Validation Module design changes proposal.

 

Hi Ryan,

 

Yes, that’s why I meant with “normal XML escaping syntax”.

Basically: we shouldn’t tell the user what to do. It’s an XML document they know how to write a double quote or a single one.

 

Before we had a XLIFF-Validation-module-specific syntax for literal ‘(‘, ‘)’ ‘”’, etc. but my understanding is that we don’t need it anymore because we don’t use any
 special characters like “()()” in the values.

 

-ys

Ps: Sorry I couldn’t join the call I was in another meeting.

 

 

From: Ryan King [mailto:]

Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:08 PM

To: Dr. David Filip; Yves Savourel

Cc: ; Kevin O'Donnell; Uwe Stahlschmidt; Alan Michael

Subject: RE: [xliff] Call for dissent csprd01 comments 033, 057, and 061 - Validation Module design changes proposal.

 

Hi David and Yves,

 

Can you please help me understand what you mean by “using normal XML escaping syntax” ? If a user needs to specify a double or single quote, they will need to escape
 it according to XML specification 1.1 section 4.6 
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#sec-predefined-ent. For example isPresent=”&#34;”.

 

Thanks

 

From: Dr. David Filip [mailto:]

Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 1:57 AM

To: Yves Savourel; Ryan King

Cc: ; Kevin O'Donnell; Uwe Stahlschmidt; Alan Michael

Subject: Re: [xliff] Call for dissent csprd01 comments 033, 057, and 061 - Validation Module design changes proposal.

 

Agreed, no need for extra escaping with the new cleaner syntax

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

mailto: 


 

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Yves Savourel <> wrote:

Hi Ryan,

> And a change to the method of escaping quotes: .double quotation mark "

> (U+0022) must be escaped by using the predefined XML entity &#34; and

> single quotation mark ' (U+0027) by using the predefined XML entity &#39;

I'm not sure I understand the escaping.

None of the new proposed notation seem to require the use of '(' or ')'.

So why we would need to even mention escaping?

One should enter the content of the attributes values like any other value, using normal XML escaping syntax when appropriate.

Or I'm missing something?

Thanks,

-yves

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php