← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Call for dissent on implementing the general properties sub-properties solution, re csprd 01 comments 021 and 053

From
Dr. David Filip <>
Date
2013-08-06T19:27:24+00:00
ID
Thread
Call for dissent on implementing the general properties sub-properties solution, re csprd 01 comments 021 and 053
Hi all,

As explained in today's meeting, for all property attributes in the spec that have a sub-property specified, such as fs and subFs, state and subState etc.

I have implemented a uniform provision consisting of a Contsraint and a PR

See it here e.g. for state and subState

Constraints

If the attribute subState is used, the attribute state MUST be specified as well.

Processing Requirements

If the attribute state is updated, the attribute subState MUST be updated or deleted.

Unless I hear otherwise by Thu, Aug 10, COB PDT, I will consider this our official resolution of the pertaining csprd01 comments.

Best regards

dF

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

mailto: 
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread