106 and 136 fixed in my working copy, will be OK on next reprint
Will reprint later today after we decide on the final module structure, 131..
Cheers
dF
Dr. David Filip
=======================
LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452
mailto:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Dr. David Filip <> wrote:
Thanks for checking this, Yves,
Dr. David Filip
=======================
LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452
mailto:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Yves Savourel <> wrote:
Hi David, Tom, all,
> Log:
> Most editorial changes implemented
> All material changes pending/awaiting resolutions Also editorial changes
> in response to comments 133 and 102, 110, 126, 135 are pending
Based on the comments tracking and the changes:
106 - I think "Please note that Agents using Processing Instruction to implement..." should probably be "Please note that Agents using Processing Instructions to implement".
Will fix
115 - ok
116 - ok
117 - ok
128 - ok
131 - ok. Just one note: it seems every module has only one second level ("Module Specification") and we have hen several entry for the third level, fourth level, etc. Removing the "Module Specification" level would simplify things (any text under that level could just go to the main level. Just a thought.
I noticed this today as well, this is a remnant of the appendix structure. Technically, the intro text would need to move from the master document to the specification document for each module and the extra section level would be killed in the master, the master would only hold the xincludes w/o any top level intro
Another option would be to promote module schema listings a level higher, so that we would have two second level items for each module, specification and schema listing following the general intro..
@Bryan, let us decide on this one in today's meeting..
136 - the added <note> element points to <target>.
Will fix
Cheers,
-yves
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
