Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [xliff] IDs - uniquness and source/target exception (B)

From
Dr. David Filip <>
Date
2013-11-11T18:24:39+00:00
ID
CANw5LKkQpsSTa8LFLo15hyQ=fXrx3iv4V9bw=
Thread
Re: [xliff] IDs - uniquness and source/target exception (B)
Thanks Yves, I will take it as a go from you here and discuss the "unit uniqueness" pool issue in the other thread..

Cheers

dF

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: 

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Yves Savourel <> wrote:

Hi David, all,

To move forward on this:

> Old text:

> "The value MUST be unique within the <segment> or <ignorable> elements and

> inline elements with the same id in both source and target MUST be

> corresponding elements."

> [please note that segment or ignorable had to be replaced with unit to

> resolve the ID related issue A]

> [also inline elements were knocked together with segment and ignorable to

> resolve the ID related issue C]

> Proposed text:

> . [When used in <segment>, <ignorable>, <mrk>, <sm>, <pc>, <sc>, <ec> or <ph>:]

>   o Inline elements enclosed by a <target> element MUST use duplicate id values

>     of their corresponding inline elements enclosed within the sibling <source>

>     element if and only if those corresponding elements exist.

>   o Except for the above exception, the value MUST be unique among all of the

>     above within the enclosing <unit> element.

> I would not place the constraints into source and target. I would just have a

> note on target pointing to the id definition

As I noted in https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201311/msg00042.html I don't think the matter of whether or not <segment>

and <ignorable> have their IDs included in the same uniqueness requirement as the inline codes and annotations has been resolved

yet.

Fredrik had good reservations about this during the last call. I may have missed something, but I don't think we came to a

conclusion during the call.

Except for that caveat, and a probably missing "the" in "...MUST use (the) duplicate id...", the new text looks OK to me.

Cheers,

-yves

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Next in thread → Next in month →