Call for dissent: csprd02

I checked and Yves is correct <ignorable> and <em> do not have FS attributes. I propose removing them from the list of elements in the FS section.

 

If I do not receive dissent by the end of the week I will consider this approved.

 

Thanks,

 

Bryan

 

129: 
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/201310/msg00015.html

ignorable and fs

 

Hi all,

 

The section describing the fs:fs attribute says:

 

"Used in: <file>, <unit>, <ignorable>, <notes>, <note>, <originalData>, <data>, <cp>, <sc>, <ec>, <ph>, <pc>, <mrk>, <sm> and <em>."

 

It's incorrect: <ignorable>, <em> do not have fs attributes.

 

Regards,

-yves