RE: [xliff] proposed solutions for CSPRD 138 (Unique Particle Attribution) - version attribute

From
Yves Savourel <>
Date
2013-12-04T18:09:43+00:00
ID
00a301cef11c$00e72650$02b572f0$@com
Thread
RE: [xliff] proposed solutions for CSPRD 138 (Unique Particle Attribution) - version attribute
Hi Fredrik, all,

> I don't think we necessarily need to release a new version of 
> the whole specification to add a new module, as long as it has 
> a TC namespace, now that we have the URN matching rule and no 
> explicit references from core to modules.

Indeed. If the new modules go in separate documents, then we should be ok: no changes on 2.0.

But if we do make a modification to one of the 2.0 modules, or remove one: the same questions remain. What will be the changes then?

Cheers,
-ys