RE: [xliff] proposed solutions for CSPRD 138 (Unique Particle Attribution) - validation

From
Yves Savourel <>
Date
2013-12-08T21:50:34+00:00
ID
00a501cef45f$849d87f0$8dd897d0$@com
Thread
RE: [xliff] proposed solutions for CSPRD 138 (Unique Particle Attribution) - validation
> Having modules.xml as a non-normative help would be fine, 
> but I'm not sure we should normalize its usage. Because 
> if we do and need to change, we'll go back to square one 
> on having dependencies when updating modules.

... Or maybe I misunderstood what you said, which is entirely possible :)

-ys